fbpx
A "Mask Required for Entry" sign in an office building/Flickr Photo by Chad Davis

To Challenge or Not to Challenge?

To Challenge or Not to Challenge?

By Steven A. Smith

We were leaving the restaurant as he was walking in. He brushed against me.

No problem – except he was unmasked. Defiantly so. It was easy to spot the casual arrogance.

There were signs on the front door and signs on the host stand and cash register.

Masks required for service.

But while we were there, I saw no sign that the mandate was enforced.

Since the pandemic began, at least since January 2021 when we started venturing out again, we have been very careful about choosing safe restaurants. On this night late last week we were in a restaurant that takes exceptional precautions, including plexiglass barriers between well-spaced booths. All staff were masked, of course. But the customers? Some but not all. It was clear that a few wanted to make a point, swaggering in their masklessness.

I am certain most of you have seen it, too.

And such risky behavior is especially problematic right now.

The latest COVID numbers are devastating.

The New York Times COVID tracker is the most complete and easily accessed resource. It is updated daily.

By the beginning of this week, the United States was averaging 700,000 new COVID cases each day, more than at any time during the pandemic. Hospitalizations were up 80% in just two weeks. There were about 1,900 deaths every day on average, adding to the national total of 840,000 by late last week.

The situation in Washington is somewhat worse than average. Cases are up about 56% compared to this time last year. Hospitalizations are up 59% and deaths up 40%. The situation in Idaho is only slightly better.

Last week, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee ordered the National Guard deployed to hospitals statewide to assist overwhelmed health workers. ICUs are at capacity and nearly all elective surgeries and treatments are on hold.

It is hard to keep a positive attitude in light of these circumstances. Nearly two years in, the new normal is depressingly similar to the old.

By now nearly all of us know someone who has had COVID if we have not had it ourselves. Some of us have lost friends or relatives.

My brother and sister-in-law in Arizona had the delta variant. My brother in Oregon caught omicron even though he is vaccinated and boosted. My nephew, a doctor, caught delta from a patient.

Last week, in Colorado, my daughter and her wife caught omicron. They are vaccinated and boosted, too.

All of my family members have taken extraordinary precautions for the last two years. But those precautions were not enough. The extent of their illnesses varies. Thankfully, all I mentioned above seem to have mostly recovered.

Carla and I have escaped infection so far. We took a trip to California over the holidays, foolish in retrospect. Looks like we dodged the bullet.

But then you see a “Trump Won 2020” mask-less buffoon near you at the airport or brush by a mask-less asshat in a restaurant and so wonder how long your luck will hold out.

During dinner we had a conversation that many of you probably have had, too. When you see someone flouting public health rules and recommendations, do you say something, do you confront?

My first instinct was to say something. But Carla, whose advice I value more than any other, urged caution. Why pick a fight with someone who seems to be looking for one? If someone gets in your face, maybe. But otherwise let it go, she said because an argument can only increase your exposure. My son later said the same thing.

They are right, of course. But keeping quiet seems an inadequate response, if not cowardly.

What is the right thing to do? How do you respond? How should you respond??

My mother, who could be quite wise (and who may have died of COVID quite early in the pandemic) always said it is up to us to live our principles, to stay true to our own beliefs knowing we cannot change other people. But she could be feisty, too. I think I know what she would do.

As for me, I remain uncertain. I just don’t know.

Check Also

university of idaho

How Journalists Are Not ‘Seeking the Truth and Reporting It’ with UI Homicides

Reporters are supposed to find the news, tease out rumor and innuendo to report facts; but too many reporters covering the story are using rumor as the basics of their stories. Too many are using words like “terrible” and “horrifying” in their work. I’m sorry, but: Duh. Of course the story is, they do not need to state the obvious. Following the memorial service at UI, too many reporters leaped onto the innuendo for their stories. One Spokane TV reporter speculating the crowd was uneasy because, “They did not know if the murderer was right next to them.” Talk about irresponsible reporting, that is a prime example. OK, I get it – the information is slow to come out. The police are protecting what information and leads they have. They absolutely do not want to jeopardize this case when it goes to court.