The Spokesman Review has a duty and obligation as the leading mainstream newspaper in our community to provide us with a fuller range of viewpoints on issues affecting each of us today.
In his recent column in the Spokesman-Review Steve Massey wrote about people who are transgender as though they are simply imaginative wayward children seeking to change reality to their will, instead of human beings with the right and dignity to decide how they want to live; deserving of respect of their freedom and choice. He ignores the very real duty and obligation of all faiths to acknowledge the harm done to people in religion’s name.
There have been thousands of years of this same cycle. Enough. Let us acknowledge the truth. Throughout history, all over the world, there have been many types of genders. It is a fluid concept – as is “reality” as we know from philosophy. Faith shouldn’t be taught without a basic understanding of philosophy.
Massey painted a colloquial, simplistic, view that reduces the questions of all human existence to convenient quotes making up a veneer of nicety via tradition. Tradition is also often known as “what is normal” and is used as a reference guide to make up rules of cultural reality about how some sort of people are the “right” sort of people, but others aren’t. Well, I don’t want to be the “right sort of people” if that’s the right sort of people. Like Huckleberry Finn, I’d rather go to hell. To paraphrase Shakespeare, be true to yourself then you can be false to no one.
We humans are so much more complex than any one book. No one written book or story can contain the rich, complex, lived experience or life and uniqueness of any one human being. There are truths that cannot be described by language which are not in written books, or religions. Life is so much more than that, and I am glad of this.
It is no small irony Massey mentions people who are transgender as seeking to bend reality to their own will when religions that are Bible-based, as well as many other religions and faiths, have sought to change “reality” and the world to fit their own will while rejecting scientific truths for thousands of years.
They’ve thrown fit after fit, and temper tantrum after tantrum, whenever their social or hierarchical ways of holding on to power were in danger from truths that spoke to and challenged their power structures. It is the longest lesson learned in the course of humanity when a religion has to give up the ghost and admit they are wrong. They fear that their whole way of life and authority over the discourse of what constitutes “truth” or “reality”, and thus their authority, will be called into question.
This authority should be called into question because it is the same authority that forcefully imposed its incorrect views of reality onto peoples of entire continents, refusing to recognize the order that already existed in many other cultures, which had many different genders. This resulted eventually in horrific genocides and brought us to where we are right now, at this moment in history.
The writing is, therefore, on the wall.
Recognize that people can decide for themselves who they are. Those who must repent aren’t people who are transgender, but rather those who seek to do them harm. It is my personal faith and belief that each person is a book to be treasured that is wholly holy and unique unto themselves. I’m far more interested in the living books who are my friends and my community than even my most treasured book written by a person on paper or digitally.
Each person then is in charge of their own book in my estimation, yet, can glean knowledge and wisdom from the world around them and other human beings. I treasure books. I treasure people. I would like it if – instead of consulting the Bible as the authority – Steve Massey would consult the true authority on what it means to be transgender: people who are transgender themselves.
I am glad the editor of the Spokesman-Review wrote an apology. In the meantime, I am going to continue to appreciate each unique person I know. And I hope in the future when presenting such a topic, the Spokesman will have a better diversity of writers representing the voices needing to be heard so there is truly freedom of speech.
Kelly Rae Mathews grew up in culturally and faith diverse San Diego, Calif. during the 70s and 80s before moving to Spokane in 2004. Growing up in a such a diverse environment with amazing people, led Mathews to be very empathetic and open to the insights of many different faiths, she said. She loves science fiction and this also significantly contributed to and influenced her own journey and understanding of faith and values. She agrees with and takes seriously the Vulcan motto, when it comes to faith and life, “Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations.” Therefore, it is no surprise she has a degree in anthropology as well as English. She has studied the anthropology of religion and is knowledgeable about many faiths.
She completed an anthropological research project on poets of the Inland Northwest, interviewing over two dozen poets, their audiences, friends, family members, and local business community who supported the poetry performances. Mathews gave a presentation on How Poets Build Community: Reclaiming Intimacy from the Modern World at the Northwest Anthropological Conference, at the Eastern Washington University Creative Symposium, the Eastern Washington University Women’s Center and the Literary Lunch Symposium put on by Reference Librarian and Poet Jonathan Potter at the Riverfront Campus.
She was a volunteer minister in San Diego for about 10 years while attending college and working in various editorial positions.
Her articles, poems and short stories have appeared in Fickle Muse, The Kolob Canyon Review, Falling Star Magazine, Acorn, The Coyote Express, The Outpost and Southern Utah University News.
Many of your prescriptions run completely opposite of the Bible’s teaching, so for biblical centric Christians your arguments are problematic. Using the abuses of any group as the reason to reject them means every philosophy, group, belief, sex, religion, political theory, person or even animal will fail to live up to your demand. Steve presented a typical ultra-conservative evangelical perspective. Personally I think he has some points that were biblically problematic, particularly claiming that desire is sin.
“but each person is tempted when they are dragged away by their own evil desire and enticed. Then, after desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is full-grown, gives birth to death.”
“After desire has conceived” speaks of a process in my mind that contradicts his statement that someone’s struggles, temptations or desires are sinful. His position sweeps a whole lot of folks into condemnation for having desires that may or may not be acted upon.
So I guess, instead of you trashing everyone who believes in the truth of the Christian scripture, why not challenge his ideas with a good philosophical argument. Yours seemed to me to be a reactionary diatribe presented from your own view of what other people should or should do.
I am a Bible-centered Christian pastor, and I think Massey has it all wrong. If you are interested in broadening your scope of understanding on the issue, from a biblical perspective, I encourage you to read this book. You’ll find it quotes the bible from the original languages, and never deviates from the biblically-centered idea that God loves all that God created. https://www.amazon.com/Bible-Transgender-Experience-Scripture-Supports/dp/0829820426/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1503118230&sr=8-1&keywords=transgender+bible
I would give my eyeteeth to read a Blauerian take on the book you link to, Jan.
It wouldn’t matter and you know it, we have come to different conclusions and convictions of the truth regarding gender. “The master said, “He who sets to work on a different strand destroys the whole fabric.” -Confucius, Analects II. 16
Eric, will you at least read the book? I have studied the scriptures from both perspectives, have you?
I’ve read, listened to, watched speakers and debates on the issues. I’ve engaged personally here and face to face convos on the subject with pro&con positions. The arguments presented by progressives are biblically, scientifically and rationally unconvincing to me. I am convinced that Jesus’s teaching in Matthew 19 covers the “original intent” argument clearly and convincingly in matters of gender and marriage.
Does the Confucius quote mean we all need to read the Bible the same way?
Just to be clear, it wouldn’t matter because your interpretation of scriptures on this point cannot possibly be incorrect in any way, or it wouldn’t matter because discerning the truth of scripture is less important to you than maintaining membership in your chosen tribe?
And maybe, if it is so weak, be destroyed. Or at least patched up.
You refer to believers’ “sacred and beautiful faith and love of the truth.” I can’t speak for Kelly but I do think a lot of Spokanites sensed little to none of that in Massey’s column.