fbpx
40.1 F
Spokane
Thursday, March 28, 2024
HomeCommentaryJesus, ISIS and the Bible

Jesus, ISIS and the Bible

Date:

Related stories

Lost in Translation: Isn’t It Time We Moved Beyond a Fear-Based Repentance?

When I hear the kingdom is at hand, followed immediately by the command to repent, the good news is overshadowed by the fear that I’m not good enough to be part of the kingdom of God.

Inspiring Others: How Our Marriage Turned 50

As we prepare to celebrate 50 years there are so many thoughts and memories going through my head. I have joked about how I don't know how you've put up with me for this long, which is really true in a sense with my Irish enthusiasm and temper.

Taking the Road ‘Less Traveled by’ Has Made ‘All the Difference’

Pete Haug remembers hearing Robert Frost read his poem "The Road not Taken" 65 years ago. It reminded him of his spiritual journey out of the Christianity of his youth into choosing the Baha'i faith as an adult.

Ask an EOC: Can You Confess in Private to God but not in Church Confession and be Forgiven?

Concerning the sacrament of Confession, Christ directly gave the authority to his Church to remit or retain the sins of the penitent. 

Stuff: Do We Have Too Much? Depends on What Kind.

“Stuff” is one of those words in English that has so many meanings it almost defies definition.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img

[todaysdate]

By Thomas Schmidt

I find much of the recent conversation about possible responses by Jesus and Christians to the horrors of ISIS limited to one view of God among many that are presented in the Bible. Most of the discussion on that post was very interesting, but by only two people. They seemed to limit their view of the Bible to the presentation of God in the Bible as being vengeful, judging and against nonviolence. Both writers made very good points, but commentar Steve seems to be limited in his broader presentations to responding to SpokaneFAVS blogger Eric Blauer, thereby limiting the discussion.

It would be a very cogent discussion if the Bible were, like the Quran, written by one person over a relative brief time. But that is not our Christian or Hebrew Bible. For example, the Torah is an anthology, very mixed together, of four major cultures, with sections being developed or written over many centuries. It was assembled some time after the Babylonian exile. The first two, known for the past 200 years by scholars as the J and E documents (after YHWH for J, in Judea, and Elohim for E, in the Northern Kingdom) portray God as very forgiving and merciful, and rejecting blood sacrifices. J is a little less so than E. This vision of God was the more traditional and ancient. When the Northern Kingdom fell, many of their priests and leaders went down to Judea, which threatened the priestly class in that area, the tribe of Levites, descendants of Aaron in sole charge of the proceeds of sacrifices and the operation of the Jerusalem temple. A writer for this group tried to counter the influence of the newcomers by expounding a newer view of God as a wrathful and fearsome God of violence and retributive justice, one who is not light on punishment, and one who called for blood sacrifice. This writer, or small group of Aaronites, wanted to preserve their power and privileged status, controlling the market on sacrifice. Under their control, one could not get God’s forgiveness without first paying for and having a blood sacrifice. They wrote out almost all acts of mercy on God’s part, and wrote in many examples of his threatening violence. Take a look at the addition of Exodus 34:7b, a P document,  to Exodus 34:6-7a, a combined JE document.

Instead of adopting one version of the Torah over another, a group of scribes decided to include all in an anthology, mixing the three writings together. When one understands the context and history of the development of the Bible, we see that we cannot refer to one of the viewpoints as if it were the only one. I think that is the mistake of most of the comments so far written, which selectively pick out passages that support the writers inclination to violently put down terrorism. Unfortunately, that limits the possible responses, portraying theirs as called by God, and condemning the rest.

Personally, I believe that is what idolatry does, and is close to blasphemy, to the point of even declaring what is and is not the actual character of God. That is not for us to say. I prefer the merciful, forgiving God to the angry, wrathful view, but who knows. All I know is that, as a follower of nonviolence (I am not a pacifist, for I see myself as too weak and unintelligent), violence begets violence. And, please don’t denigrate pacifism as taking a do nothing stance that does not respond dynamically to the current desperate problems. That is insulting.

And that brings me to a second point. Nowhere do I see any of the self reflection necessary for the taking of any responsible moral position actually tempering the above responses. YES!! The actions of the IS are horrific, but they are not the only actions that have killed innocents and devastated cultures. Our state has far exceeded in numbers of innocents murdered than the victims of the IS. That cannot be denied, the figures are out there. By saying that I am not blaming the West, or the victims any more that I would blame IS. It is insulting to say that I am blaming the nation I love. Blame solves nothing. I strongly believe that we must see our own participation clearly and with humility. Our actions have contributed to the problems, and that must stop if there are to be any solutions. We ignore the evil of our responses only to face the resulting escalation of violent countermeasures. We become our own brand of terrorist, and thereby our own enemy. 

I do not know what to do here. I will respond with and call for nonviolent responses, but also cannot rule out a highly selective threat and even use of violence.  However, I do know that the responses are not limited to the either pacifist no response, as pacifism has been mis-portrayed in the discussion, or military violence. There are many more options, and I do believe we must stop assuming that our way of life and our economic institutions are the only acceptable alternatives. If God is merciful, just, forgiving and loving, I would much rather participate in a discussion of the many possible actions we could take with our immediate neighbors and our enemies than the limited pacifist versus militarist views of God would solicit.

Thomas Schmidt
Thomas Schmidt
Thomas Schmidt is a retired psychotherapist and chemical dependency counselor who belongs to the Sufi Ruhiniat International order of Sufi’s and is a drummer in the Spokane Sufi group and an elder at the Country Homes Christian (Disciples of Christ) Church. He is a member of the Westar Institute (The Jesus Seminar people). He studied for the ministry in the late 1950’s at Texas Christian Church and twice married Janet Fowler, a member of a long tern TCU family and a Disciple minister. He was active in the Civil Rights Movement, studying philosophy at Columbia University and psychology in the University of North Carolina university system. He has taught philosophy and psychology, and was professionally active in Florida, North Carolina, and, for 25 years in Spokane. He has studied and practiced Siddha Yoga, Zen Buddhism and, since the mid 1970’s, Sufism and the Dances of Universal Peace. He has three sons and three grandchildren. With the death of his wife, Janet, he is continuing their concentration on human rights, ecology, and ecumenical and interfaith reconciliation.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
spot_img

2 COMMENTS

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Steve Beck
9 years ago

I also think discussion is good about interaction with enemies HERE. The reality is that only a small fraction of a percent of Americans, not to mention Christian Americans, will EVER come into contact with ISIS. But, it seems, like all “worst case scenarios”, we want to use them as a starting place for building Christian ethics. To me it seems backwards.

Eric Blauer
9 years ago

Well what’s great about all this is the fact that we will get the opportunity to put our words into practice, since it is here and I am sure within the next year or so, we will have another attack in America from such people as this kid: http://www.khq.com/story/26727956/chicago-teenager-arrested-for-trying-to-join-isis

spot_img
2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x