If the Public Wants Justice: A Follow-up with Senator Maria Cantwell
What started as an article suggesting the need for a change in the federal Impeachment process, has morphed into a look at how Americans ‘may’ be treated when they reach out to their federal elected officials. My first follow-up was with Sen. Patty Murray and now it’s on to the other Senator from Washington, Maria Cantwell.
Below is the text of a message sent, via an online form, to my congressional representatives, Senators Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray, and Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers. Sen. Cantwell, replying 28 days after I reached out to her, was the second to reply.
Dear Senator Cantwell,
In my opinion, the United States needs to modify the Presidential Impeachment process to provide more assurance to the American people that justice is being served by the procedure and it’s results.
As a Republican who voted for Donald Trump in 2016 and 2020, I’m still not sure that justice was the primary thing our country saw in either of his impeachments or that of Bill Clinton.
Feeling so strongly about this on the day Mr. Trump was recently acquitted, I wrote an article for Spokane Faith and Values, which you can read here – https://spokanefavs.com/if-the-public-wants-justice-impeachment-trials-must-change/ – highlighting some of the ‘problems’ I saw with the trial in comparison to criminal court cases.
My hope is that you’ll read the article and, if you feel my concerns are legitimate, consider how you might work with fellow members of Congress to make things better.
Though far from a legal scholar, I would be glad to ‘meet’ with others, who share my concern, to brainstorm potential improvements to the system.
Thank you for your consideration of my concerns and for your service to our country.
In the email I received in response, the email heading was, “Thank you for contacting me regarding the attack on the U.S. Capitol building and the second impeachment of President Donald J. Trump.” Nice try but I never mentioned the Capitol building attack and clearly stated my concern about the last three impeachments.
The rest of her email focused briefly on the history of the insurrection at the Capitol, and in greater detail on the reasons President Trump should be held accountable for his actions; “He promulgated lies about the election, used his office to try to interfere with election officials doing their job, and failed to protect our Capitol from a mob that clearly intended to cause physical harm to elected officials and to stop the lawful certification of election results.”
What she didn’t talk about were these deep concerns of mine.
- My distress “about how ‘politics’ seems to be influencing the extremely important issue in our culture of presidential impeachment trials.” That quote was from the article I encouraged her to read in my email and which she never acknowledged.
- The vote for impeachment, largely along party lines. Taking her words of reply as true, she believes seven out of 50 Republicans voting for impeachment makes it a bipartisan decision. Though I did some research and didn’t find any numerical standard dictating when something is bipartisan, 14% doesn’t sound very convincing to me.
- America isn’t seeing justice when it comes to impeachment trials. I touched on seven issues, in the column I encouraged her to read, that could affect outcomes of Congressional legal proceedings, and she didn’t mention any of them.
- We need to modify the impeachment process to give Americans more confidence in government.
There’s no way for me to know with certainty how the process worked when Sen. Cantwell’s office received my comments. But based on the response I received, I am able to conclude that my concerns weren’t addressed to a level that would have built confidence in me toward my elected officials. And, based on her lack of specifically addressing my concerns, I am less than convinced to follow the last sentence of her email; “Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future if I can be of further assistance.”
Three days after receiving the senator’s email, I sent her a copy of this article in the event she wanted to respond prior to its publication. I did not receive a reply.
Scott McIntyre is glad his parents didn’t name him Vladimir or he’d be listed last on this page. While a long time California resident, he was the Oakland Spirituality Examiner for Examiner.com from 2011-12 and about the same time began blogging on several topics. The first, teaching Christians how to lovingly share their spiritual beliefs, emphasized skills that can benefit all forms of one-to-one interaction. He also writes on marriage, travel, downsizing, humor and the motive behind people’s words and actions. After retiring in 2016, Scott embarked on some major ‘R & R’ — Relocating and Rebranding. Following in his sister’s footsteps from the early 80’s, and later in the decade, his parent’s, Scott left the Golden State to become a Washingtonian in a small town just west of Spokane County.