fbpx
47.9 F
Spokane
Saturday, May 4, 2024
HomeCommentaryIf Society is Sick, What Should We Do About It?

If Society is Sick, What Should We Do About It?

Date:

Related stories

Rents Are Unaffordable Nationwide. A Renter’s Tax Credit Could Help.

According to the Low-Income Housing Coalition, there is no state or county in the United States where someone working full-time at minimum wage can afford a modest two-bedroom apartment. This column explores why that is through one women's personal experience in Las Vegas.

Facebook Post Misleads: Reading Bible in School Does Not Prevent Prison Sentences

The author critiques a Facebook post suggesting that allowing Bible reading in public schools could prevent imprisonment. She argues against this oversimplified view, highlighting issues such as religious diversity among students and the dangers of promoting one religious text over others. She also distinguishes between adult prisoners and schoolchildren, dismissing the analogy as flawed.

Unpacking Complexity: Navigating the Pro-Palestine Student Protests with Nuance

The news cycle since then has been full of stories about pro-Palestine student protests on college campuses across the country. These stories are growing increasingly complex with moving parts that can be difficult to follow. In a world that is so politically divisive, this provides us with a great opportunity to practice nuance.

Voting Is An Act of Faith

Voting is usually seen as a political act, but as this column explores, it is also an act of faith. Rooted in the Biblical idea that all people are made in God's image, denying someone's right to vote silences their divine voice. The piece examines how white Christian nationalism threatens this ideal through voter suppression under the guise of "election integrity." It argues voting is a sacred duty affirming human dignity, with leaders like Rev. Raphael Warnock calling a vote "a kind of prayer" enacting our spiritual values in the political sphere. The column calls on people of faith to vote their deeply held beliefs in favor of true democracy.

The Principles of War and Moscow’s Christ Church

A critical examination of the ideology and actions of Doug Wilson's Christ Church in Moscow, Idaho, raising concerns over their militant evangelism tactics, vision of a Christian theocratic state, controversial book defending slavery, and contradictory stances on biblical interpretations of slavery. The column contrasts the church's claims of being 'good neighbors' with incidents like the 'De-Mask Moscow' storming of a local store and plagiarism allegations, leaving doubts among residents about their true intentions for the community.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img

By Brien Pittman

“It is no measure of good health to be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society.” ~Jiddu Krishnamurti

By being well-adjusted to a sick society I assume he meant, poised to take personal advantage of strife and disharmony. Great quote but, perhaps more often than we like to admit, we use the quote as a sly insinuation that ‘some of us’ are already adapted to the mythical perfect society and no adjustments are necessary. As an activist, it is an easy trap to fall into since the very implication of activism is that others need to correct their course.

Like many I’ve believed the largest part of the cure for society’s sickness is to identify the groups and individuals responsible for the “sickness” of society, and find a way to disempower them; Separation of Corporation and State, with some grassroots support and elbow grease, get some new policies in place, install a new breed of political leaders, and usher into fashion a more progressive philosophy about how to govern, do business, and treat fellow humans. And, in the mean time, sourly refuse to adapt to the human world as it is now, because that would only encourage the evil corporations and lying politicians who make it so damn troublesome.

But that in and of itself will never work. The history of all societies since the beginning of civilization attest to it. At times, we are just as consumed by our own needs for personal power, righteousness, security and social dominance as the people we so proudly want to disempower. The “sickness” is not only some nasty people in positions of power, but that human beings across the globe are still working primarily from our stone-age instincts, as we saw in the previous posts. If it wasn’t so sad at times, it would be rather comical that we learn and adapt to new technologies every six months but, after 10,000 years of civilization we obviously need more time to become civilized. We’re much more efficiently wired to orchestrate a successful mammoth hunt than govern a nation intelligently.

The truth is we haven’t drifted into some unfortunate, short-term imbalance of political power and corruption. We’re in the middle of a long-term, species-wide paradigm shift to bridge the enormous gap between the kind of contentious society our stone-age minds have built us, and the kinder, safer society we’ll have once we’ve finally outgrown the smallness of our regulated human nature, and unitedly advanced our mentality. The mentality that created this mess will never ever be able to clean it up. Progress has never been driven by anything but adaptation to the current environment, and we have adapted to the brink of destruction, now to avoid the dystopian future so prophetic in much of our entertainment, we must quickly adapt once again into something better than our current mentalities, our current paradigm.

Human nature has so many magnificent ways of realizing itself and humans have seemingly endless capacities and options yet, our society is constructed in such away as to restrain nobler aspects, as if human nature is bound by unbreakable laws like physical nature. And as members of society ‘all’ of us find ourselves too often marching along in unison.

I can’t change that though can I? So, regardless of institutional structures, the responsibility of nurturing nobler aspects of human nature has and always will be mine. Not while sitting high, mentally or physically, above everyone on a monastery mountain top but, while I am in the ‘present’ experiencing the same everyday pressures my human family experiences as members of todays society.

If our interest is changing the world for the better, our responsibility is to adjust to the imperfect society we find ourselves in — this one that’s happening right now, with all its faults and ugly spots. Rather than shunning a “profoundly sick society” and holding out for smarter people to be in power; our greatest possible contribution is to learn to live sanely in this insane, dysfunctional society. To do that is to understand what makes it tick — with curiosity and love, rather than mistrust; to temper our emotional reactivity to it, to keep ourselves calm, to learn to improve our own quality of thinking, to get over our contempt for others outside our group, to make peace with civilization exactly the way it happens to be at this stage of its development but, never settle in; as if we have arrived at  the mythical ‘One True System’ that completely conforms to human nature that so many of us advocate for whether, it is religious based, science, or even lifestyles. The one true system will only create institutional structures that impose new limits on the scope and expanse of human nature, similar to how knowledge stops, when we are convinced we already have the answers. That is a bitter pill to swallow but, that type of thinking is the mentality responsible for todays society; where our nature is to reject the answers and lives of others as completely wrong, to stop listening, learning and growing. Our nature has become defensive, well adjusted faction evangelists; fighting to keep power or gain power, many times even in our personal relationships. All the while, we publically profess our disdain for such behavior.

How are we to democratize the structures of decision-making in our political, social and economic institutions, so that everyone affected by a decision has a significant role in making it? How do we empower ourselves as a self-consciously organized majority, so we can create liberatory social relations in which the free and full development of a person depends on, and is made possible by, the free and full development of all of us?

Ultimately, I guess as members of society we will have to no longer let our nature succumb to us vs. them group manipulations, and figure it out using a new mentality and paradigm. Which ever course each individual member of society decides to take, remember this thought: The only advantage that psychopaths and sociopaths have over all the rest of us in society is, psychopaths and sociopaths have a ‘valid’ excuse, for never changing. The rest of us really don’t.

Brien Pittman
Brien Pittman
Brien’s articles for FāVS generally revolve around ideas and beliefs that create unhealthy deadlock divisions between groups. He has received (minor) writing awards for his short stories and poetry from the cities of Portland, Oregon and the city of (good beer) Sapporo, Japan. In 2010 he was asked to present several articles for the California Senate Committee “Task Force for Suicide Prevention” and has been published by online magazines and a couple national poetry anthologies in print form.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img

4 COMMENTS

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Riff Mattre
Riff Mattre
7 years ago

I’d say, “…to make peace with civilization exactly the way it happens to be at this stage of its development but, never settle in,” is brilliant advice! Such one-by-one “revolutions” have the greatest lasting impact. Recognizing the components of EVERY other group as the same reorganized components of one’s own group is also by my experience sound cornerstone to both mental fortitude and human compassion. Severely “mentally ill” may simply be those of us who can’t help ourselves. The rest of us can and must. ?

Brien
Brien
7 years ago
Reply to  Riff Mattre

Thanks Riff. I know this series started out with what some considered unfair ‘labeling’ of mental illness (psychopath and sociopath) and even though history has had many examples of those who fit the clinical diagnosis, it was never my intentions to offend or make light of mental illness. In fact, I have tried for decades to be an advocate against the stigma still associated with mental illness.

Today, it is popular to hurl those two words (psychopath/sociopath) at others too freely, our current political candidates are an example of this which, I don’t personally condone. It would be a grave error though if society at large did not acknowledge that there are those, in every walk of life, as well as, positions of power, who do suffer and cause others to suffer because of their pathology. Unfortunately, some people, due to their illness, are beyond any help professionals can presently provide. (see below)

The best society can hope for (in my opinion) is to except this sad reality and find ways not to condemn but, to understand. Hopefully, some day a cure or treatment will be discovered . Until then I’m afraid all we can do is learn to protect and guard our society from their influence which, is felt on a daily basis. But never demonize those with this particular pathology or any pathology. Other than the two mental illnesses we have been discussing, all other illness’ can be treated with wonderful results and ‘that’ is also a huge part of the message our society must understand with compassion and respect.

I guess the best way for us to do that is to always remember that all change starts with us as individuals of society and our own mental fortitude.

Thank you again for your comment.

footnote: Antisocial Disorders such as Sociopathy and Psychopathy don’t want to change, and they are unwilling to work with someone if it doesn’t benefit them. A
psychopath doesn’t have a conscience. If they lie to you so they can steal your
money, they won’t feel any moral qualms, though they may pretend to. A
sociopath typically has a conscience, but it’s weak. they may know that taking
your money is wrong, and they might feel some guilt or remorse, but that won’t
stop their behavior. At worst, therapy can actually worsen sociopathic
behavior because it’s a new game for the sociopath, and because so little is currently understood by professionals. No medication exists to treat either disorder. In real life, some people with antisocial personality disorder can be violent, but most are not. Instead they use manipulation and reckless behavior to get what they want. At worst, they’re cold, calculating killers but, many others are skilled at
climbing their way up the corporate ladder, even if they have to hurt someone
to get there. It’s not easy to spot a psychopath. They can be intelligent, charming,
and good at mimicking emotions. They may pretend to be interested in you, but
in reality, they don’t care. They’re skilled actors whose sole mission is to
manipulate people for personal gain. (Mayo Clinic, DSM, National Center for Mental Health, Aaron Kipnis, PhD, author of The Midas Complex)

Riff Mattre
Riff Mattre
7 years ago
Reply to  Brien

… ?
Most revealing to me in the footnote is, “so little is currently understood by professionals.” THIS is why our applications at times appear contradictory which is a painful dynamic. Similar to your/our acknowledgement of the need to simultaineously accept (‘make peace’) and not accept (strive for betterment), I don’t depend on a DSM to tell me that one of the greatest indicators of mental balance/health/fortitude is a capacity to openly SPEAK one’s FEARS to one’s tribe. OUR current understanding of OUR psychology and implementation of current mainstream interventions will one day be perceived as similarly primitive as understandings and interventions of a century ago. Similar to when somone suggests sex reassignment surgery is no longer a CHOICE for many, but rather, NECESSITY; this is a painful and dangerous normative narrative for US to pursue. We’ve already established that we are in territory much more conducive to in person exchange, so I will leave off here. Again, THANK YOU for your courage to engage!

Brien
Brien
7 years ago
Reply to  Riff Mattre

Dude, some very strong and poignant points made in your comment.
And thank you for the compliment.
I’ll leave off here also before Neal starts making fun of us lol
He still hasn’t told me if he wants to play the role of the table. I think he’d be perfect 🙂

4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x