Flickr image by fdecomite

Faith and Film – Disconnecting

Share this story!
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

By Carrie Lockhert

Swipe left. And again. Faster! Someone is hovering behind me, clearly impatient at my inability to make up my mind.

Hmm … what am I in the mood for tonight?

Suspense? Historical Drama? Chick-flick? Sci-Fi Adventure? Horror? Slap-stick comedy?

Nothing sounds good … I just can’t decide.

Standing in front of the outdoor Redbox as a line of impatient customers grows behind me only exacerbates my indecision.

Forget it. I just can’t decide and am not willing to spend two hours of precious time on a movie that may have scored below my 3.0 rating threshold. Next time I need to do more research and order online to avoid the pressure. I could simply gamble the $1.63 and try a movie that looks decent. My problem is I know that once I start the movie, even if it is bad, I won’t turn it off, and lead to further frustration.

Story-telling is probably one of the oldest forms of entertainment if not the oldest form. But ever since Thomas Edison and William Dickson invented the first moving-picture projector called the Kinetoscope in 1891, with the addition of sound in 1929, the art of weaving a tale to engage, delight, inform and even frighten audiences has evolved into a thriving industry and a common pastime.

According to eMarketer, the average American adult spends 5.5 hours per day glued to a screen viewing some form of digital content. This is roughly a 15 percent increase in just four years from 2011 to 2015.

Pretty mind-boggling isn’t it?

The irony is that the average person perceives their lives to be “time-constrained” and, as University of Maryland sociologist John P. Robison pointed out in the Wall Street Journal article, “We’re Working More Hours-and Watching More TV,” “If you’re got time to watch television … you’ve got time.” On the flip side, the article also highlighted the U.S. Labor Department’s finding that time allocated to education in a 24-hour period declined by about 14 percent from 29 minutes in 2013 to 25 minutes in 2014.

Clearly a disconnect exists.

Like many Americans, I am guilty of having more TVs in my house than I really need and I also confess to spend more hours looking at my iPhone than I probably should. Having spent over 2 decades in advertising and marketing, I appreciate the power of moving pictures to create emotion and compel audiences to feel and act. But because I have this knowledge, I also have a heightened awareness of my personal responses to videos I view on the boob-tube. At one point I took a break from watching the daily news on TV because I had become increasingly agitated, angry and fearful of people and the world. But my ostrich behavior didn’t serve me well on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001 when my husband had to inform me of a life-changing world event because I missed it. It became clear that I needed to be an informed citizen, since at the time I was much too young to become a complete hermit.
Given the array of digital content available for viewing at any given moment coupled with the hours folk invest in an average day, I couldn’t help but wonder more about the type of content people were “consuming.”  In my investigation I came across a few disturbing statistics regarding television viewing habits for children. Statistic Brain found that:

  • 54 percent of 4-6 year olds preferred watching TV over spending time with their fathers.
  • Annual hours per year the average American youth spends watching TV = 1,200 hours
  • Annual hours per year the average American youth spends in school = 900 hours
  • Number of violent acts seen on TV by age 18 = 150,000
  • Number of 30 second TV commercials seen in 1 year by an average child = 16,000

Not only are we spending more hours viewing, but the content is less than optimal.”

Educational digital content is readily available, but have the increased hours spent in front of the screen focused on the Discovery Channel or have they instead been glued to MTV’s “Jersey Shore,” along with 4.8 million other viewers, watching Snooki cheat on her boyfriend with her best friend’s guy?

Time is important. But perhaps content is equally or even more critical.

Personally, discernment in my choice of viewing coupled with an increased sensitivity to my emotional and even physical responses to the shows I watch arms me with the tools I need to navigate instead of hibernate.

The result?

I don’t watch horror movies; they give me nightmares and I can’t sleep. Who needs that?

I love picking up new ideas on Ted Talks.

I try to obtain more news content in the written form or on NPR instead of video so I am still informed, but less overly fearful.

Crying through a good drama or laughing through a quality comedy can often be extremely therapeutic.

If I could just give up my iPhone email, texting and social media and communicate with the people in front of me, I’d be set!

Join SpokaneFAVS for a Coffee Talk forum on “Faith and Film” at 10 a.m., April 2 at The Community Building, 35 W. Main Ave. Lockhert is a panelist.

About Carrie Lockhert

Carrie Lockhert, a multi-generational Spokane native, earned her undergraduate degree from the University of Washington in English with an emphasis in writing during an era when white-out was purchased in bulk and privilege could be assessed by ownership of an electric typewriter vs. a manual one. Two decades, two marriages, three kids and multiple jobs later she thanked both God and human fortitude for the evolutionary shift in online education options that were afforded through the “computer age” by obtaining her graduate degree in Higher Education Administration online through Northeastern University in Boston. She truly is a bi-coastal Husky.

While Lockhert has spent her professional career in marketing, advertising and higher education enrollment services she finds herself continually called to speak what others may feel prohibited in articulating. Her self-deprecating candor and transparency about her life and spiritual path is one that many find either intimidating or inspiring. Under the guidance of her spiritual director, the Rev. Kristi Philip, Lockhert joined her love for writing with her desire to focus on human commonality in contrast to human differences by starting a blog, InspirationCrossing.com. As an Episcopalian, Lockhert appreciates the value of differing perspectives and encourages others to dialogue on their various viewpoints, ultimately believing that all are connected and one, whether Christian, Jew, Buddhist or atheist.

Lockhert endeavors to provide her readers with a real-life, and at times raw perspective, of viewing and incorporating fundamental spiritual principles into daily life challenges and fortune — even if through the disclosure of her own personal failure.

Visit My Website
View All Posts

Check Also

Unpacking the word “Queer”

Why are many young people using this word to describe their sexuality rather than “gay” when it used to mean “weird”?

One comment

  1. Sound films for dramatic purposes were introduced in 1926 (by Warner Brothers’ Vitaphone to provide recorded music for all their theaters). Warner Bros’ The Jazz Singer rocked the scene in 1927 because of the impact of some of Al Jolson’s ad lib dialogue recorded as part of the musical numbers, in what was otherwise a silent movie with recorded music. All the studios moved quickly to sound after that (including Fox with their sound on film recording method, that they’d been using in sound newsreels for many years), and became virtually ubiquitous by 1929.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *