I-522 campaign signs
I-522 campaign signs

The ethical, spiritual side of I-522

Share this story!
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
I-522 campaign signs
I-522 campaign signs

Grocery aisles in Washington State could be a little different in 2015 if voters approve Initiative 522 next week.

Most of the processed foods and beverages that dominate the shelves are made with some sort of genetically modified crop — like soy or corn. The ballot measure would require those products to be labeled.

Campbell Soup, PepsiCo and Kellogg are among the companies pumping money against the I-522 initiative, claiming the measure is misleading, would hurt farmers and raise grocery costs.

Proponents of the initiative, however, say it’s an ethical issue about giving consumers the right to know what they’re eating.

“What people want is labeling so they can have a choice about what they’re putting into their bodies. It’s their choice what’s healthy for them, and not somebody else’s” said Ron Cully, a grass roots activist for I-522.

However some researchers say there’s no evidence that GMOs pose health and safety risks.

Monsanto, a chemical and agricultural biotechnology company that opposes I-522, claims on its website that plants and crops with genetically modified traits have been tested thoroughly and that there has been no credible evidence of harm to humans or animals.

Ellen Maccarone, associate professor of philosophy at Gonzaga University, said there are both pros and cons to GMOs.

“If we were talking about golden rice in India preventing childhood vitamin A deficient blindness, that would be a pro. But generally here we are not talking about those things. The cons have to do with a wider set of issues about how food is grown, who has control over it, and how it is processed and how that affects health and the environment,” she said.

A labeling GMO initiative, Proposition 37, failed in California last year, but in June Connecticut and Maine passed food labeling legislation, although those laws won’t take effect until other states pass similar measures.

Maccarone said this shows that there’s a growing interest in consumers wanting to know where their food is coming from.

“The increase in farmers markets and the like indicate that people are thinking about food and the food economy differently than just a few years ago,” she said. “Food has always had a central role in people’s spiritual, ethical and cultural lives. Giving them information so they can do this with more integrity is something we shouldn’t be afraid of.”

If the measure passes, Washington would be the first state to pass a mandatory GMO food-labeling law with no stipulations.

About Tracy Simmons

Tracy Simmons is an award winning journalist specializing in religion reporting, digital entrepreneurship and social journalism. In her 15 years on the religion beat, Simmons has tucked a notepad in her pocket and found some of her favorite stories aboard cargo ships in New Jersey, on a police chase in Albuquerque, in dusty Texas church bell towers, on the streets of New York and in tent cities in Haiti.
Simmons has worked as a multimedia journalist for newspapers across New Mexico, Texas and Connecticut. Currently she serves as the executive director of SpokaneFAVS.com, a digital journalism start-up covering religion news and commentary in Spokane, Wash. She is also a Journalism Instructor at Washington State University.

She also writes for The Spokesman-Review and for the Religion News Service.

Visit My Website
View All Posts

Check Also

“Politics Is Local”

Half the country breathed a sigh of relief at noon Wednesday. My social media feeds blew up with visceral expressions of that relief – emotional, heartfelt, teary.

2 comments

  1. I would like to know. So I can make my own choice.

  2. My relatives every time say that I am killing my
    time here at net, except I know I am getting experience daily by
    reading such pleasant articles.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *