Washington’s same-sex marriage legislation is tugging at the heartstrings of the state’s faith community.
Is it both a legal and a religious issue? Should the church respond? If so, what’s the appropriate response?
About a dozen people came together to discuss these topics Monday evening at Indaba Coffee for “Can We Talk? An Open and Civil Conversation about Marriage,” an informal Referendum 74 discussion group.
“We’re all here because we hope and think that as human being we can do better than name calling,” said the Rev. Liv Larson Andrews. “The Body of Christ can do better than mudslinging, and the Body of Christ should be able to disagree with itself fairly and robustly.”
The group, made of people of different faith and political backgrounds – though mostly liberal — discussed the purpose of marriage, the history of the tradition and the church’s involvement in it, among other subjects.
The Rev. Tom Altepeter, of St. Clare Ecumenical Catholic Community, said he wonders if the church should at all be involved in the same-sex marriage debate, noting it’s a political issue.
“What role does the Bible have at all in this, seeing as how it’s a legal discussion?,” he asked.
He said forcing Christian perspectives isn’t fair to America’s other faith groups.
Aaron Weirdert agreed that marriage has a long history in religious communities and said even though Washington has “Everything But Marriage” rights for same-sex couples, the concept of marriage is significant and has meaning.
“It (marriage) brings something to the unit…No matter which side you’re on, it’s still important,” he said.
But Blauer rebuttled, saying what many have said — if Washington legalizes gay marriage, what’s next?
Bishop Blase Cupich, of the Catholic Diocese of Spokane, for example, recently wrote, “If marriage is only about relationships, why limit unions to two people? Why does the new law include the traditional prohibition of close kinship unions for both opposite and same sex couples?”
“If I say yes to this, what am I going to yes to down the road?” Blauer said. “Who gets to determine what the narrative is?”
The group agreed that if one loses focus it could be a slippery slope, but urged those worried about future issues to focus on the issue at hand.
Though the group only met for an hour, it touched on many issues and Larson said she hopes people went home realizing that marriage is a blessing for the world and the community and hopes to have more conversations about the issue in the future.
Rev. Liv Larson Andrews, Sam Fletcher, Neal Schindler and Eric Blauer attended this event and are SpokaneFAVS contributors.
- VIDOE – Coffee Talk: Responding To Hate & Violence, Part 2 - August 7, 2022
- Now Hiring: Freelance Reporters - August 2, 2022
- Seeking Local Human Rights Champions - July 26, 2022
- Gonzaga offers $500 prize to person or organization countering hatred￼ - July 23, 2022
- VIDEO! Pop up Coffee Talk: Roe v Wade & Scotus – How my Faith Tells me to Respond - July 20, 2022
- How one church is staying “Grounded” - June 28, 2022
- Some Celebrate, Some Vow to Fight Back: Spokane Responds to Reversal of Roe V. Wade - June 24, 2022
- I am learning that ‘being’ is more compelling than ‘doing’ - May 16, 2022
- A tribute to my source, and friend, Pastor Andy CastroLang, who will retire this year - April 18, 2022
- At Upcoming Hybrid Event Panelist Will Discuss “Separate Histories, Common Challenges” - February 23, 2022