fbpx
39.8 F
Spokane
Thursday, March 28, 2024
HomeCommentaryAskAsk An Atheist: Contingent Existence

Ask An Atheist: Contingent Existence

Date:

Related stories

My Journey through Homelessness Part Five: Learning to Live Outside the Box

The value of my homeless experience lies not so much in having learned how to live outside — at least not in the geographical sense. The value of my homeless experience lies in having learned how to live outside the box.

Lost in Translation: Isn’t It Time We Moved Beyond a Fear-Based Repentance?

When I hear the kingdom is at hand, followed immediately by the command to repent, the good news is overshadowed by the fear that I’m not good enough to be part of the kingdom of God.

Inspiring Others: How Our Marriage Turned 50

As we prepare to celebrate 50 years there are so many thoughts and memories going through my head. I have joked about how I don't know how you've put up with me for this long, which is really true in a sense with my Irish enthusiasm and temper.

Taking the Road ‘Less Traveled by’ Has Made ‘All the Difference’

Pete Haug remembers hearing Robert Frost read his poem "The Road not Taken" 65 years ago. It reminded him of his spiritual journey out of the Christianity of his youth into choosing the Baha'i faith as an adult.

Ask an EOC: Can You Confess in Private to God but not in Church Confession and be Forgiven?

Concerning the sacrament of Confession, Christ directly gave the authority to his Church to remit or retain the sins of the penitent. 

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img

What do you want to Ask an Atheist? Submit your questions online or fill out the form below.

By Jim Downard 

If everything in the universe has a contingent existence, why is there something rather than nothing?

SPO_House-ad_Ask-an-atheist_0425133I have touched on this one before.  Is “nothing” an option?  Is it in the rule book that the universe itself cannot be (wink at Aristotle) an Uncaused Cause?  Or that anything can prevent universes (ours or others) from existing?

All such “Origins or Bust” questions are attempting to resolve unresolvable fundamental issues (even the question posed had to be a conditional, based on an “if”).  As far as we can tell right now, all the physical matter of the universe tracks back to an initial Big Bang around 13.8 billion years ago.  None of the known religious stories match up all that well with those data, though apologists do text trawl and parse to make pieces of it fit.

Whether anything in a meta- or multiverse existed “prior” to the beginning of our space — time (and whether “prior” has any meaning in that context) is fun speculation but doesn’t make either the evidence of what happened after that (billions of years of natural change turning the initial energy into matter and eventually stars and eventually solar systems with planets, lots of supernova burps in between) including the evolution of living forms down to us) go away, or render any theological explanations for that (take your pick) any more useful or plausible.

Let’s turn the question around.  If not everything about the universe needs to have a contingent existence, could there ever be nothing rather than something?

I guarantee you, answering that question is just as unresolvable and assumption driven as the first one.

Have fun.

Jim Downard
Jim Downard
Jim Downard is a Spokane native (with a sojourn in Southern California back in the early 1960s) who was raised in a secular family, so says had no personal faith to lose. He's always been a history and science buff (getting a bachelor's in the former area at what was then Eastern Washington University in the early 1970s).

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
spot_img
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x