fbpx
37.6 F
Spokane
Thursday, March 28, 2024
HomeCommentaryBarriers That Need to be Removed: Exclusive Claims Of Religion

Barriers That Need to be Removed: Exclusive Claims Of Religion

Date:

Related stories

Lost in Translation: Isn’t It Time We Moved Beyond a Fear-Based Repentance?

When I hear the kingdom is at hand, followed immediately by the command to repent, the good news is overshadowed by the fear that I’m not good enough to be part of the kingdom of God.

Inspiring Others: How Our Marriage Turned 50

As we prepare to celebrate 50 years there are so many thoughts and memories going through my head. I have joked about how I don't know how you've put up with me for this long, which is really true in a sense with my Irish enthusiasm and temper.

Taking the Road ‘Less Traveled by’ Has Made ‘All the Difference’

Pete Haug remembers hearing Robert Frost read his poem "The Road not Taken" 65 years ago. It reminded him of his spiritual journey out of the Christianity of his youth into choosing the Baha'i faith as an adult.

Ask an EOC: Can You Confess in Private to God but not in Church Confession and be Forgiven?

Concerning the sacrament of Confession, Christ directly gave the authority to his Church to remit or retain the sins of the penitent. 

Stuff: Do We Have Too Much? Depends on What Kind.

“Stuff” is one of those words in English that has so many meanings it almost defies definition.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img

By Brien Pittman

Clearly, a great danger lies in waiting when people close themselves into circles of certainty from which they cannot break free; these individuals have their own absolute truth. Each considers anything not his/her truth a lie. As the journalist Marcio Alves once said, “They suffer from an absence of doubt.” When one has absolutely no doubts in their version of “truth” they stop searching for answers and they refuse to question, or recognize beliefs and practices that are abusive, or acknowledge the suffering they create.

In my understanding, uncritical faith is a barrier that can only be removed by experiential education and the practice of mature spirituality. Education increases our own ability to widen out our hearts, not only for the experiences of others, but many times for our own unacknowledged experiences as well.  Thus our reality and depth of spirituality are enlarged.

In other words if we genuinely increase our own enlightenment of humanization, which is intrinsic to mature spirituality, it immediately ushers in the recognition of dehumanization, in all of its forms and degrees, whether it exist in our countries, religions, or homes and this recognition should become our motivating force for action; and this action will constitute a bold act of love in direct opposition to the lovelessness found not only in religious abuse but also in all forms of repression.

Imagine for a moment that one group decided the entire world must speak one language, have only one culture and that one way of life was best for all people and then they proceeded to promote this singularity. It’s not a far stretch of the imagination, for history and present day is full of such oppression, correspondingly spirituality that remains infantilized to the point of promoting supremacy of one religion as the only truth for all humanity, would also be oppressive.

In belief classes I have noticed that the concept of religious inclusiveness initially poses a hurdle, but after some critical thought and individual prayer, words like “pluralism” take on a more spiritually enlarged meaning.

Hinduism, the largest pluralistic religion in the world, teaches that there are many paths, many sages, and many holy books and that no religion can claim any exclusive or final representation of truth. This does not mean that Hinduism does not recognize a unity to truth. On the contrary, Hinduism recognizes a total and profound unity but one that is broad enough to allow for diversity and to integrate multiplicity, like the many leaves on the Hindu banyan fig tree.

This Hindu pluralism has confused people coming from singularistic religious traditions, such as have dominated the Western world, who are baffled by the great diversity within Hinduism. It has caused them to look upon Hinduism as a collection of cults or sects rather than any consistent religious heritage. However if we look deeply into the many-sided vision of Hinduism we will discover that it has much wisdom to teach everyone. Today in the emerging global era we must learn to handle the great diversity of human beings and their often very different cultures. This requires a pluralistic vision in all aspects of life, from which religion, often the most important aspect of human culture, cannot be excluded.

We can contrast the Hindu view with that of dominant Western religions and their singularistic religious traditions of one God, one prophet, or savior and one holy book that has led them to promote the supremacy of their belief for everyone. Despite the fact that many other cultures have their own form of spirituality, Christianity and Islam, with few exceptions, have sought throughout history to convert the entire world to their faith, and to this end have often tried to discredit, if not suppress other traditions — a practice that still continues today.

In the dawning global age we can no longer claim that any one religion is the only truth for all humanity any more than we can claim that one language, culture or way of life is the best for all. We must have a broad enough view to recognize what is of value in the different peoples and cultures of the globe from so-called aborigines, who have a much deeper understanding of nature than modern people, to the great civilizations not only of Europe and the Middle East but of America, Africa and Asia, including those not built upon Biblical religious ideas.

Come back to FAVS for parts two of this series.

Brien Pittman
Brien Pittman
Brien’s articles for FāVS generally revolve around ideas and beliefs that create unhealthy deadlock divisions between groups. He has received (minor) writing awards for his short stories and poetry from the cities of Portland, Oregon and the city of (good beer) Sapporo, Japan. In 2010 he was asked to present several articles for the California Senate Committee “Task Force for Suicide Prevention” and has been published by online magazines and a couple national poetry anthologies in print form.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
Previous article
Next article

4 COMMENTS

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Matthew Sewell
Matthew Sewell
9 years ago

Brien, thanks for the article.

However, I noticed a big logical loophole known as a “self-referential incoherence” in your bit about Hinduism and pluralism.

“Hinduism, the largest pluralistic religion in the world, teaches that there are many paths, many sages, and many holy books and that no religion can claim any exclusive or final representation of truth. This does not mean that Hinduism does not recognize a unity to truth.”

So, Hinduism teaches that there are many paths to the truth, and yet they promote that *their* way (albeit, supposedly, in many ways and paths) is the *one* correct way to the truth. It’s logically inconsistent, because it’s at odds with itself.

Brien
Brien
9 years ago

Thanks for your comment. Two generations ago your comment would have been spot on however, in the last couple of decades there has been a complete shift in Hinduism to the point that followers have become so embracing and accepting of other faiths, many ancient Hindu beliefs are becoming blurred over causing the danger of amorphous unity with other religions.
In the next post a clearer definition of what pluralism represents will be covered and this definition is what Hindu leaders are helping followers of Hinduism understand so their ancient and beautiful teachings do not disappear completely due to their broad acceptance of other faiths.

Thank you

Tom Schmidt
Tom Schmidt
9 years ago

If we are not literalists and believing in the possibility of a literal revelation of any idea, but specifically of the idea that the revelation is absolutely and literally true, we belong to the group of people and groups that are “Polydox”, a term coined by Alvin Reines in his 1987 bok, Polydoxy. It is the belief that there are many ways, some better than others, but all open to discussion and respect. No one has power or authority over another, nor the right to inforce his or her beliefs on others through force or threat. Most of us belong to this liberal group. Without the discussion it can lead to wishy-washy piety that avoids any controversy or discussion of difference, a state of mindlessness comparable to blind obedience to orthodoxy. While that extreme can lead to shallow materialism and isolated spirituality, it is not as deadly as the extremes of orthodoxy, which can lead to terrorism and religious violence. Both can lead to being pawns of secular political movements. For me, the answer is to discuss and commune with others, relishing our differences, and empathizing wth our problems. Loving your neighbor.

Brien
Brien
9 years ago

Thank you for your well thought out comment Tom!

spot_img
4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x