fbpx
Over many years, Baha'i-owned properties in Ivel, Iran, have been attacked and unjustly confiscated, displacing dozens of families and leaving them economically impoverished. These images show a home that was burned in 2007

Baha’i persecutions escalate in Iran

Baha’i persecutions escalate in Iran

By Pete Haug

Last February a story broke about Iranians demolishing homes of Baha’is with court approval. “No wrongdoing had occurred,” the court determined, because “ownership of property by the 27 Baha’is” was not valid “due to their membership in the Baha’i faith.”

At the time, a spokesman for the U.S. Baha’i Public Affairs Office termed that decision “significant” because it represented a “departure from prior written opinions.” Judges in the past admitted orally that “religious discrimination” was “the reason for their decisions,” but in written opinions they were careful to justify similar confiscations using technicalities, such as alleged violations of zoning/permitting ordinances.

The spokesman called the written admission of discrimination “worrisome” because it “may signal a growing lack of concern with public opinion,” which “has long been the primary mitigator of Iranian government persecution against Baha’is.”

That observation was prescient. A year later Iran’s regime is increasing  its own wealth by confiscating Baha’i properties, according to the Baha’i International Community (BIC). The execution of Imam Khomeini’s Order (EIKO) is orchestrating a rising trend of confiscations of Baha’i properties. EIKO is entirely controlled by Iran’s leadership. It holds extensive assets across Iran.

“The seizure by…EIKO of Baha’i properties is a novel and very worrying development for Iranian Baha’is,” said Diane Ala’i, BIC representative at the United Nations in Geneva. “This development demonstrates that the highest levels of Iran’s leadership are orchestrating the persecution of the Baha’is in Iran.” Examples include:

  • Last month, an apartment(link is external) in Mazandaran Province belonging to a Baha’i, Sheida Taeed, was ordered to be confiscated;
  • In December of last year, 13 irrigated farmland plots belonging to Baha’is in the village of Kata in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province were appropriated in the midst of a water crisis;
  • Farms owned and cultivated by Baha’i families for more than a century in the village of Roshankooh, also in Mazandaran, have been seized; and
  • Last March, a global campaign that trended under #ItsTheirLand brought attention to years of official efforts to uproot dozens of farming families from the Mazandaran village of Ivel.

A judge ordered the properties in Semnan to be transferred to EIKO under Article 49 of the Iranian Constitution. Under Islamic law, Article 49 requires the government to prove the legitimacy of such seizures. Misusing this law to justify confiscations demonstrates the religiously-motivated purpose behind the seizures.

“Iran’s leadership is enriching itself while impoverishing and displacing the Baha’is,” Ala’i said. “Seizures in Semnan, Mazandaran and Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad provinces may be just the beginning. The risk is that more properties will continue to be seized, in a piecemeal fashion, in an attempt to evade the notice of the international community. Supporters of human rights inside and outside Iran must condemn this outrageously unjust ruling and demand that it be rescinded without delay.”

Ala’i said asset seizures stretch back decades in  Semnan, where they appear to have been used as a laboratory prior to systematic campaigns of country-wide persecution against Iranian Baha’is. Attacks there have been notable for their particular intensity, she said, and for the mobilization and coordination of official and unofficial elements. These include police, courts, local authorities and the clergy. Persecution there has ranged from hate speech to economic strangulation, arrests and physical attacks.

Background Facts:

  • As Iran’s largest non-Muslim religious minority, Baha’is have been systematically persecuted by the government since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
  • More than 200 Baha’is were executed in the years following that Revolution.
  • A 1991 policy document signed by Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, called for progress and development of Iran’s Baha’i community to be “blocked” and for Baha’is to be denied education and livelihoods. Thousands of propaganda articles against the Baha’is are published each year in Iran’s state media.
  • Hundreds of Baha’i-owned private properties, including homes, small businesses and farms, have been confiscated since the Islamic Revolution.

Religious persecution is not new. Generations of Jews were persecuted long before unnumbered Christians were martyred, beginning with Jesus Himself. In the 19th century 20,000 Babis, followers of Baha’u’llah’s Forerunner, were slain. These events have been documented by Fereydoun Vahman, Professor Emeritus at Copenhagen University, in his 2019 book “175 Years of Persecution: A History of the Babis & Baha’is.” Baha’i persecutions continue around the world, most notably in Muslim countries, although not usually as intensively as in Iran.

About Pete Haug

Armed with an AB in English literature, Pete Haug plunged into journalism fresh out of college. That career lasted five years while he reported for a metropolitan daily, edited a rural weekly, and worked in industrial and academic public relations. He abandoned all for graduate school, finishing with an MS in wildlife biology and a PhD in systems ecology. Pete taught college briefly, then for a couple of decades he analyzed environmental impacts for federal, state, Native American, and private agencies. His last hurrah was an 11-year gig teaching English in China. After he retired in 2007, curiosity led Pete to explore climate change and fake news and to give talks about both. About five years ago he returned to journalism to write columns under the watchful eye of his draconian live-in editor and wife Jolie. They’ve both been Baha’is since the 1960s. Pete’s columns on the Baha’i Faith represent his own understanding and not any official position.

View All Posts

Check Also

Gay pride flags should not be banned in classrooms

I agree that in general, classrooms shouldn't be a place to push a particular political ideology or campaign. However, simply being gay in school isn't a political campaign. It's a recognition that a teacher's classroom is a safe place for gay kids. If that's political to you, even if the teacher never once mentions a political candidate, you've probably got a problem with the existence of the gay kids.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.