Before the fall, nudity was acceptable. After the fall, Adam and Eve were covered. Why the inconsistency?
Because the story of the Fall in the Book of Genesis was never intended to be taken literally, the physical nudity of Adam and Eve likewise should not be the focus when one reads about it. Instead, the story of the Fall is meant to evoke a greater meaning, that of man severing his harmonious relationship with his Creator.
When God created Adam and Eve, he created them in perfect union with him. They were sinless, but they still had the gift of free will, and thus had the capacity to choose against God. And so, Adam and Eve’s nakedness points to that reality — their utter purity and stainlessness in their relation to God. The fact that Adam and Eve are depicted as naked before the Fall, then, after their disobedience, as hiding themselves and being covered indicates the nature of sin and how we relate to God while we’re mired in it.
So, in this case, “clothing” is a metaphor for Adam and Eve masking their true nature as a result of them saying to God, “I know better than you.” They were in pure, perfect union with God before the Fall, and had willfully severed themselves from God after it.
- Ask a Catholic: How does penance work? - August 10, 2017
- Question of the Week: Who were the most powerful women in the Bible? - March 8, 2017
- Review: What “The Young Pope” Gets Right, and Wrong - January 26, 2017
- Ask A Catholic: Adam and Eve’s Nakedness - December 22, 2016
- Ask A Catholic: How to go to Mass - October 26, 2016
- Viewpoints: The role of patriotism from your faith perspective - September 26, 2016
- Ask A Catholic: Mass is boring - September 14, 2016
- Viewpoints: Colin Kaepernick and the National Anthem - September 5, 2016
- Ask A Catholic: Will the Catholic Church unite against child rape? - August 11, 2016
- Viewpoints: Is it ever OK to lie? - August 9, 2016