Sunday, Aug 20, 2017
Home » Commentary » Ask An Atheist: Is the bible an historical document?
Flickr photo by George Bannister

Ask An Atheist: Is the bible an historical document?

Share

What do you want to Ask an Atheist? Submit your questions online or fill out the form below.

By Jim Downard

Do atheists believe the bible – at least parts of it – is a real historical document?

I won’t speak for all atheists, but will say definitely parts of the Bible reflect actual history.  There appears to have been a Davidic kingdom (even if the details may not be quite as recounted in the texts) and there was certainly a Roman empire and relevant peoples knocking around in 1st century Palestine.  I would also agree with scholars like Bart Ehrman that there was likely a historic Jesus, even if the detailed events might not be accurately covered in the limited texts that have come down about him.

The closest counterpart to this point in major religions would be the Koran, which directly recounted the actions of Mohammed in establishing Islam.  Most older religions, like Hinduism, carry lots of largely mythological baggage, as seen in Genesis (which borrowed heavily from Mesoptamian creation stories during the Babylonian Captivity–another historical event few in historical community contends didn’t happen, and so ranks as another historical period reflected, with a lot of window dressing, in the received texts).

Jim Downard

About Jim Downard

Jim Downard is a Spokane native (with a sojourn in Southern California back in the early 1960s) who was raised in a secular family, so says had no personal faith to lose.

He's always been a history and science buff (getting a bachelor's in the former area at what was then Eastern Washington University in the early 1970s).

View All Posts
Share

Comments

comments

Check Also

Sensing Your Hidden Presence

Stunned a bit by my own blindness I realize I too have the small mind of the disciples.

Share